Posted: 27 April 2008 21:57
During Saturday's archive visit I came across mention of a new bridge being built at Barcombe Mills by the Canadians in 1941 to allow heavy tanks to cross the River Ouse.
Although it is well-known that this bridge was a later addition, I was interested in a roadblock of 40 pimples at the southern end that were cast shortly afterwards. Unfortunately, a walk along the verge showed that all had now gone; the bridge was rebuilt at some point afer the war and so they were probably removed at the same time.
This newer bridge causes a lot of confusion amongst those who don't realise that the Type 24 and Type 28 pillboxes on the 'island' predate it; they only defend a pair of bridges (the original road) while the 1941 bridge bypasses them.
Two other nearby Type 24s had their doors bricked up late last year making a total of four pillboxes now made inaccessible.
Even so, I decided to pay a quick visit to them both and was rewarded with an interesting discovery. This corkscrew picket in a nearby stream indicates the presence of a barbed wire perimeter as part of the pillbox's defence.
Only a small find, but it proves that you don't always need to get inside a structure to learn something new about it.
Generic term for a hardened field defensive structure usually constructed from concrete and/or masonry. Pillboxes were built in numerous types and variants depending on location and role.
Small anti-tank block in the form of a truncated pyramid. Pimples were used to extend anti-tank obstacles and roadblocks and were intended for use on soft ground.
A pillbox designed to house a small artillery piece (typically a WW1 6-pounder gun), usually sited to cover a bridge or other defile. Type 28a variant had an additional compartment for infantry defence.
This site is copyright © Peter Hibbs 2006 - 2018. All rights reserved.
Hibbs, Peter Bridges at Barcombe Mills (2018) Available at: http://pillbox.org.uk/blog/216549/ Accessed: 18 June 2018
The information on this website is intended solely to describe the ongoing research activity of The Defence of East Sussex Project; it is not comprehensive or properly presented. It is therefore NOT suitable as a basis for producing derivative works or surveys!