Posted: 29 July 2013 20:04

A recent trip into the Sussex Weald covers a long expanse of roadblock locations at Burwash Common, Burwash, Etchingham and Robertsbridge.

An added bonus was the presence of the Corps Stop Line just two miles to the north and so I found myself yo-yoing between the A265 and the River Rother.

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

I stopped off first at Burwash Common; the two roadblocks that were here have no surviving evidence and so I took my first detour of the day up to Witherenden Bridge.

The approach to the bridge was lined with 15 buoys along the verge; this was a good start, as the original roadblock had a total of 18.

The 1941 Roadblock Report lists vertical rails in sockets here too.

It does perhaps reveal the level of communication between the army and the County Council (who sunk the sockets into the road surface) that there were five rails, but only four sockets to put them into!

About 280m away on private land and covering the bridge, stands the Type 28A pillbox shown below.

Type 28 pillbox

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

I moved on to the next bridge, seen at right.

This gives you an idea of the terrain; lanes only one vehicle wide, punctuated by the occasional small brick bridge.

This particular bridge had 15 buoys and 12 vertical rails, with only 7 sockets for the latter.

Unfortunately, no roadblock evidence remains here today.

It's also only a very small bridge, but it had a Type 24 pillbox as well as another Type 28A built to the north to defend it.

Using a public footpath, I located the Type 28A shown below on the western flank.

Type 28 pillbox

The interior was quite filthy - the floor was covered with a thick layer of stodgy mud, with branches and other debris scattered about.

Type 28 pillbox

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

I followed the footpath across the road and found the variant Type 24 pillbox perched on the bank of a small stream.

It has only three embrasures, and the entrance is offset to one side on the rear wall.

An external blast wall protects the doorway, but, unlike other pillboxes in this area, this does not have an embrasure in it.

The pillbox itself has no rearward-facing loopholes; one was omitted due to the position of the door, but there's seemingly no reason why the other was, and why the flanking walls are solid too. This lack of all-round vision/defence makes the pillbox vulnerable to infantry assault from the flanks or rear.

A blast wall divides the interior in two. The amount of brambles and nettles around the entrance prevented me (wearing shorts) from getting in, so the photo below taken through an embrasure is the next best thing.

Type 28 pillbox

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

On my way to the next bridge, I chanced upon the three buoys at right on the verge near a small bridge (white railings in background).

These buoys are not listed by the Defence of Britain Project, and neither are they in the roadblock report. I have no reference to them or defence/demolition of this bridge from other sources.

So, have they been moved since the war? I'll cover this scenario in a separate post...

I really enjoy driving these narrow country lanes and chancing across surprises such as this.

The next bridge bore no fruit in terms of surviving relics, and so I made my way back onto the A265 and drove out to Burwash.


Burwash is a beautiful village, perhaps most famous for its association with author Rudyard Kipling whose house, Bateman's, is about half a mile south and open to the public.

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

Kipling's son, John, was a Lieutenant in the Irish Guards, and was killed in September 1915, aged just 18.

Lt. Kipling's name is one of those on the Burwash War Memorial, and our next stop is just here.

One roadblock was on the A265 to the west of the memorial. It was recorded in 1941 as comprising just two cylinders, which, given the width of the road, was being optimistic to say the least. It's not surprising that it was regarded as redundant.

A second block was to the south, downhill from the monument as seen at right.

Note the high walls on both sides; ideal siting for a roadblock. The block comprised 30 cylinders, but an extra 24 were proposed, as were 18 hairpin rails and five pimples. In the event, these extra obstacles were not implemented.

Both Burwash Common and Burwash were designated as defended villages as opposed to nodal points. This implies that they were only discreet Home Guard defensive localities without any obligation to hold the defences for a set length of time. This probably explains why there are comparitively few roadblocks defining a perimeter.

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area


The next concentration of defences are at Etchingham, two miles eastwards.

Two out of the three roadblocks in the area are, not surprisingly, on bridges over the stop line.

The photo at right is the bridge just east of the railway station; the formidable obstacle the river provides is evident here, hence the block.

Again, no evidence of the vertical rails, buoys or cylinders that once stood at the roadside.

There were a few stop line pillboxes in this sector too, but I failed to see any of them - maybe they'll appear when the vegetation is low in winter.


Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

The final stopping off point was at Robertsbridge, a wartime nodal point.

There were a pair of roadblocks in the village proper, but documents I found from May 1941, indicate that the focus of the nodal point was to be around the river crossing to the north. (Photo at right).

One reason for this was to reduce the number of civilians (50) that would need to be evacuated to Salehurst, just down the road.

This left a garrison of 75 Home Guard to man the roadblocks and other defences. The document refers to a 'defence post to the north', which ties in with a pair of pillboxes for which I have grid references from another document; no trace could be found of these.

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

One final defence work at this stop line crossing was a railblock.

Just to the south of the road bridge, a railway line crossed the road at an angle and passed over its own bridge.

The line is actually being reconstructed by the Rother Valley Railway, as the photo at right shows. It currently stops short of the road, but it appears that there are plans to extend it to meet the Kent and East Sussex Railway at Bodiam.

The photo below shows the remains of the railway crossing over the river, as seen from the road bridge; the railblock would have been at the right hand end of the bridge.

Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area

A long day with many miles travelled; I covered 25 sites in all, a few of which I've described above. As can be expected, very few sites still retain evidence, which is why only a few of them make it to this blog.

Today's adventure has, however, taken in not just roadblocks, but pillboxes, stop lines, nodal points, finishing with a railblock next to a roadblock.

Although this part of my research is all about roadblocks, they form just one element of a network of defences, and if you bring these into the picture, you begin to understand roadblocks!

- Pete



Blog Latest

Review of 2018
31 December 2018



Small concrete roadblock obstacle comprising a truncated cone with domed base. A hollow shaft down the centre allowed the buoy to be manhandled using a crowbar. Buoys were deemed of little value by 1941 and cylinders seen as a better solution.


Reinforced concrete cylindrical obstacles with a shaft down the centre in which could be inserted a crowbar for manhandling, or a picket for barbed wire. Cylinders were 90cm high and 60cm wide and deployed in groups of three as a more effective alternative for buoys.

Defence of Britain Project

A large project run by the Council for British Archaeology (CBA) 1995-2002, collecting data on 20th century military structures submitted by a team of some 600 volunteers. The result was a database of nearly 20,000 records which is available online. The anti-invasion section of the database contains nearly 500 entries for East Sussex.


Term applied to a structure scheduled for demolition or already demolished. Walls and small buildings might be taken down to clear fields of fire or impede enemy passage by destroying a bridge. Some demolitions were not intended to be carried out until after invasion had begun, for example, certain bridges or road craters (pipe mines).


A loophole or slit that permits observation and/or weapons to be fired through a wall or similar solid construction.



Nodal Point

Defended road junction(s), usually within a village/town with a Home Guard garrison intended to deny enemy use of the roads. Nodal Points were not to defend the village, but solely the road network. Category 'A' Nodal Points were to hold out for 7 days after invasion without outside assistance.


Generic term for a hardened field defensive structure usually constructed from concrete and/or masonry. Pillboxes were built in numerous types and variants depending on location and role.


Small anti-tank block in the form of a truncated pyramid. Pimples were used to extend anti-tank obstacles and roadblocks and were intended for use on soft ground.


Concrete-lined shafts dug into road surfaces into which rails or RSJs (hairpin or straight) could be inserted to form a roadblock. When not in use, a wooden cover was placed over each socket.

Stop line

A physical continuous anti-tank barrier, normally a river and/or railway line, often defended by pillboxes. Stop line crossings (roads, railways and bridges) were to be made impassable.

Type 24 pillbox

A six-sided (but not a regular hexagon) pillbox. The Type 24 is the most frequently seen pillbox in East Sussex, mostly along stop lines. It can be found in thin wall (30cm) or thick wall (1m) variants.

Type 28 pillbox

A pillbox designed to house a small artillery piece (typically a WW1 6-pounder gun), usually sited to cover a bridge or other defile. Type 28a variant had an additional compartment for infantry defence.

This site is copyright © Peter Hibbs 2006 - 2019. All rights reserved.

Hibbs, Peter Roadblock Recce (36) Burwash area (2019) Available at: Accessed: 25 August 2019

The information on this website is intended solely to describe the ongoing research activity of The Defence of East Sussex Project; it is not comprehensive or properly presented. It is therefore NOT suitable as a basis for producing derivative works or surveys!